Composition for mucosally delivering fruit cell cultures and/or preparations derived therefrom and methods of using same

ABSTRACT

A pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition comprising a cell line callus culture of grape berry cells grown in vitro, whereby the cell line callus culture of grape berry cells is derived from one or more of grape-berry cross section, grape-berry skin, grape-berry flesh, grape seed, grape embryo of seeded or seedless cultivars or grape seed coat.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 11/884,774, filed on Sep. 20, 2007, which is a national phaseapplication of PCT international application no. PCT/IL2006/000249,international filing date Feb. 23, 2006, international publication no.WO 2006/090388, which in turn claims priority from U.S. provisionalpatent application No. 60/655,918, filed on Feb. 25, 2005, all of whichare incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to active health promoting ingredientsfrom red grape cells (RGC), more particularly, to therapeuticformulations thereof.

Modern scientific thought is that chronic heart disease (CHD) andstrokes are symptoms of a common illness related to a lack ofcardiovascular (CV) health. Worldwide CV diseases account for half ofall deaths in middle age (and considerable additional disability) andone third of all deaths in old age. Most of these deaths involveischemic heart disease (IHD) or stroke (Lewington, 2003, Eur. Heart J.24:1703-1704). It also incurs a substantial burden on health budgetsprimarily due to the high cost of hospitalization and ambulatory medicalmanagement. Although heart attacks are considered to be the major causeof death in men, recent studies have clearly shown that heart attackwill strike one out of three women as well.

The process of coronary atherosclerosis development, leading to acutecoronary syndromes, is comprised of four subsequent patho-physiologicalstages: endothelial dysfunction, plaque formation, plaque developmentand plaque rupture and thrombosis.

Endothelial dysfunction is the disruption of the functional integrity ofthe vascular endothelium as a result of exposure to cardiovascular riskfactors (such as elevated LDL levels, smoking, hypertension etc.).Dysfunctional endothelium devoid of its protective properties allows theaction of atherogenetic factors on the vessel wall and promotesinflammation within the wall, thus leading to increased monocyteactivation, adhesion and migration, increased endothelial permeabilityand reduced vasodilation, thereby mediating accumulation of macrophagesand lipoproteins within the wall.

Atherosclerotic plaques are formed when macrophages ingest chemicallymodified (usually oxidized) LDL molecules to form foam cells, whichtogether with the T-cells and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) createfatty streaks, the early form of the atherosclerotic plaque.

Inflammatory mediators and other molecules promote further developmentof the plaque into a fibro-fatty atheroma, which later becomes coveredwith a fibrous cap with a dense extracellular matrix. This capstabilizes the plaque from rupture by making it larger.

Secretion of molecules (e.g. inflammatory molecules) by the foam cellsleads to digestion of the cap matrix molecules, ultimately leading toplaque rupture, formation of a thrombus (clot) and arterial occlusion.This typically leads to a heart attack or a stroke.

Until a few years ago, most physicians considered atherosclerosis as aplumbing problem, caused by a halting of arterial blood flow by a plaquewhich had reached a particular size. It was claimed that the shortage ofoxygenated blood to indispensable tissues, such as the cardiac muscle orbrain tissue, especially at critical moments of greater need, wasresponsible for the induced heart or brain stroke. However, recentstudies have clearly shown that in fact only about 15% of heart attackshappen this way. Pathological and other studies have demonstrated thatevents, which follow inflammatory processes leading to breakage of theplaque fibrous cap and resulting in blood clotting, are responsible formost heart attacks and brain strokes [Libby, 2002, Nature 420:868-874;Libby, 2004, Sci. Am. Special edition 14:50-59]. Since inflammatoryprocesses are involved in all steps of atherogenesis, from endothelialdysfunction to plaque rupture, interference with these inflammatorymechanisms may help to prevent or fight atherosclerosis.

This new view of atherosclerosis explains the limited success andunwanted side effects of some of the medical treatments ofatherosclerosis, developed during the last twenty years. For example,balloon angioplasty and stents may mediate rupturing of the residualplaques, thus eliciting strong inflammatory response. The presentstrategy of medically treating atherosclerosis emphasizes prevention ofplaque creation and development of drugs that may cope with theprocesses leading to inflammation and clot formation. Such currentin-use drugs include statins (inhibition of LDL biosynthesis);beta-blockers (reduce hypertension or pulse rate); aspirin (helps inprevention of inflammation or blood clotting); and anti-oxidants(prevention of LDL modification).

A strict correlation between reduction of deaths from heart diseases andincreased wine consumption was reported twenty five years ago.Substantial studies clearly demonstrated the positive effect, unrelatedto alcohol, of moderate red-wine consumption on coronary heart disease(CHD) mortality, known as the “French Paradox” [Renaud and de Lorgeril,1992, Lancet 339:1523-1526; Criqui and Ringel, 1994, Lancet344:1719-1723]. Moreover, it was suggested that polyphenols, which arepresent at higher concentration in red rather than white wine, act asantioxidants that protect blood low-density lipoproteins (LDL) fromoxidation, a modification that is known to be a key risk factor in thedevelopment of CHD.

Recent results have demonstrated the participation of several proteinsin the inflammatory processes which leads to CHD, whose levels may beregulated by constituents present in red wine: Endothelin-1 (ET-1), apotent vasoactive peptide (Kinlay et al. 2001, Curr. Opin. Lipidol.12:383-389); endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), NO producer inendothelial cells (Leikert et al. 2002, Circulation 106:1614-1617); theplatelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) which is active in VSMC (Iijima etal. 2002, Circulation 105:2404-2410) and the inflammatory markerC-reactive Protein (CRP; Aikawa & Libby, 2004, Can. J. Cardiol.20:631-634).

Use of red wine as a source of these regulatory constituents is limiteddue to its high alcoholic content. Likewise, use of grapes or grapejuice as a source of these active agents is limited due to their highsugar content. In addition, it has been shown that the therapeuticeffect of wine and wine grapes is dependant on species, location, year(annual climate), processing etc. and therefore reliance on red wine oredible grapes as a source for consumption of these regulatory compoundsdoes not lead to a homogeneous or consistent supply of material.Furthermore, grapes are typically contaminated by residual fungicides,pathogens, pesticides and pollutants.

A major problem associated with the potential benefit of polyphenolspresent in red wines and grape seed extracts lies in theirbioavailability to target tissues and cells (Manach and Donovan, 2004,Free Rad. Res. 38:771-785; Williamson & Manach, 2005, Am. J. Clin. Nutr.81:243 S-255S). Due to marked differences in their bioavailability whilepassing through the intestines, no obvious correlation can be drawnbetween the abundance of a certain polyphenol in a given food and itsconcentration as an active compound in vivo. The absorbance offlavonoids in the small intestines, for example, ranges from 0-60% ofthe dose, and elimination half-lives range from 2-48 hours [Manach andDonovan, 2004, supra]. Most polyphenols undergo extensive metabolism inthe intestine, and are present in serum and urine predominantly asglucuronides, methyl or sulfate conjugates.

The mucous layer in the mouth is the potential site that providesimproved absorption rates for the beneficial polyphenols. Thebioavailability of trans-Resveratrol was reported to be increased if,instead of being immediately swallowed, the polyphenols were retained inthe mouth for one minute before swallowing; considerable amounts oftrans-Resveratrol were then measured in the plasma just two minutesafter administration (Asensi et al, 2002, Free Radic Biol Med.33:387-398). In addition, recent epidemiologic evidence supports theview that dietary flavonoids exert protective effects in oral diseases,including cancer (Browning et al, 2005, J Pharm Pharmacol. 57:1037-42)if activated by the saliva.

PCT patent application publication WO 00/35298 and PCT patentapplication publication WO 01/21156 teach chewing gum containingmedicament active agents, including nutritional supplements such asgrape seed extracts and polyphenols. Fruit cell culture preparations(e.g., extracts), or fruit cell line culture extracts are not disclosed.European patent application EP 1327441 teaches a chewing gum compositionuseful for reducing nicotine exposure in a subject. The agent thateliminates nicotine is an extract of a mixture of different plants,fruit and the polyphenols quercitin or catechin. Grape skin extracts arementioned as natural pigments to color the chewing gum and not as activeagents. As mentioned herein above, both grape skin and grape seedextracts provide non-defined, non-consistent and non-homogenous activeagents. Unlike skin or seed extracts, fruit cell culture, and moreparticularly fruit cell line culture, produces highly definedphytochemicals without many of the associated interfering compounds suchas sugars and pectins, in a tightly controlled environment that can bemanipulated to influence the types and amounts of active compounds.

There is thus a widely recognized need for, and it would be highlyadvantageous to have a fruit cell, and more particularly a grape cellline extract, rich in active agents formulated to enhancebioavailability for the treatment of inflammatory disorders.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided apharmaceutical composition comprising as an active ingredient a fruitcell culture and/or a preparation derived therefrom and apharmaceutically acceptable carrier suitable for mucosal delivery.

According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided apharmaceutical composition comprising as an active ingredient a grapecell line culture and/or a preparation derived therefrom, formulated formucosal delivery.

According to yet another aspect of the present invention there isprovided a method of treating an inflammatory disorder, the methodcomprising, mucosally administering to a subject in need thereof atherapeutically effective amount of a fruit cell culture having ananti-inflammatory activity and/or a preparation derived therefromthereby treating the inflammatory disorder.

According to still another aspect of the present invention there isprovided a method of treating an inflammatory disorder in a subject, themethod comprising, administering to a subject in need thereof aneffective amount of a grape cell line culture and/or a preparationderived therefrom, thereby treating or preventing the inflammatorydisorder.

According to an additional aspect of the present invention there isprovided a use of a grape cell line culture having an anti-inflammatoryactivity and/or a preparation derived therefrom, for treating aninflammatory disease.

According to yet an additional aspect of the present invention there isprovided a use of a fruit cell culture and/or a preparation derivedtherefrom, for mucosally treating an inflammatory disease.

According to still an additional aspect of the present invention thereis provided a method of identifying a fruit cell culture having ananti-inflammatory activity, the method comprising identifying from aplurality of fruit cell cultures, at least one culture having ananti-inflammatory activity above a predetermined threshold, therebyidentifying the fruit cell culture having the anti-inflammatoryactivity.

According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provideda method of identifying a tasteless or tasteful fruit cell cultureand/or a preparation derived therefrom, the method comprising analyzinga plurality of fruit cell cultures and/or preparations derived therefromfor taste; and selecting the tasteless or tasteful fruit cell cultureand/or the preparation from the plurality of fruit cell culture, therebyidentifying a tasteless or tasteful fruit cell culture and/or apreparation derived therefrom.

According to yet a further aspect of the present invention there isprovided a tasteless fruit cell culture and/or a preparation derivedtherefrom.

According to still a further aspect of the present invention there isprovided a pharmaceutical composition comprising as an active ingredienta plant cell culture and/or a preparation derived therefrom and apharmaceutically acceptable carrier suitable for mucosal delivery.

According to further features in preferred embodiments of the inventiondescribed below, the fruit cell is a fruit cell-line.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the fruit cell comprises at least 2% polyphenols.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the fruit is selected from the group consisting of grape,apple, blueberry, prune, cranberry, elderberry, bilberry, gentain,orange, mango, kiwi, pomegranate, blackberry, raspberry, strawberry,pear, cherry, plums tomato, grapefruit, pineapple, persimmon and evodiafruit.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the grape is a colored grape.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the grape is a non-colored grape.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the fruit is of a wild variety.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the fruit is of a cultivated variety.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the mucosal delivery is selected from the group consistingof mouth delivery, pharynx delivery, esophagus delivery, rectal deliveryand vaginal delivery.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the mouth delivery is selected from the group consisting ofa buccal delivery and a sublingual delivery.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the preparation comprises a hydrophilic extract of saidfruit cell culture.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the cell culture and/or preparation comprises at least 2%polyphenols.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the cell culture and/or preparation comprises less than 1%alcohol.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the cell culture and/or preparation is tasteless.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the cell culture and/or preparation is tasteful.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the cell culture and/or preparation is provided in anon-coloring concentration.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the cell culture and/or preparation comprises less than 10%sweetening sugar.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the cell culture or cell line culture is geneticallymodified.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the inflammatory disease is atherosclerosis.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the mouth delivery is affected by the group consisting of amouthwash, a strip, a foam, a chewing gum, an oral spray, a lozenge, acapsule, a toothpaste and a food.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the mouth delivery is affected by a chewing gum.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the administering is effected mucosally.

According to still further features in the described preferredembodiments, the anti-inflammatory activity is measured by an increasein eNOS production and/or a decrease in ET-1 production in anendothelial cell culture.

The present invention successfully addresses the shortcomings of thepresently known configurations by providing a fruit cell cultureformulated for mucosal delivery.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill inthe art to which this invention belongs. Although methods and materialssimilar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in thepractice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods andmaterials are described below. All publications, patent applications,patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated byreference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the patentspecification, including definitions, will control. In addition, thematerials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intendedto be limiting.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is herein described, by way of example only, withreference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now tothe drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are byway of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of thepreferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presentedin the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful andreadily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspectsof the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structuraldetails of the invention in more detail than is necessary for afundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken withthe drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the severalforms of the invention may be embodied in practice.

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a bar graph illustrating the concentration of endothelin-1 inhuman endothelial cells grown on plain medium (left) and mediumcontaining Cabernet Sauvignon wine dry-material dissolved in the mediumat a concentration that is not toxic to the endothelial cells used inthe bioassay (center) or red grape callus extract (right).

FIG. 2 is a photograph of a Western-Blot analysis of eNOS levels incultured human endothelial cells, grown on medium in the presence of redgrape callus extract. Lanes 2 and 3 illustrate the amount of eNOS incultured endothelial cells, grown on medium alone. Lanes 4 and 5illustrate the amount of eNOS in cultured endothelial cells, grown onmedium containing an enriched polyphenol fraction obtained fromlyophilized Cabernet Sauvignon (Binyamina 2002). Lanes 6 and 7illustrate the amount of eNOS in cultured endothelial cells, grown onmedium containing an extract obtained from 0.25 mg of the red grapecallus cells (lane 6) and 0.5 mg of the callus cells (lane 7). Lanes 8and 9 illustrate the amount of eNOS in cultured endothelial cells, grownon medium containing chicken serum activator taken from feed-restricted(lane 8) and free-fed (lane 9) chickens. Lane 10 illustrates the amountof eNOS in cultured endothelial cells, grown on medium containingcommercial Cabernet Sauvignon (Binyamina 2002, IL). Lane 1 is amolecular weight marker.

FIGS. 3A-C are HPLC patterns of grape cell line extracts of the presentinvention following acid hydrolysis (2N HCl, 60 minutes, 100° C.).Polyphenol profiles were visualized by their absorbance at 530 nm (FIG.3A), 310 nm (FIG. 3B) and 280 nm (FIG. 3C).

FIGS. 4A-C are HPLC patterns of grape cell line extracts of the presentinvention without acid hydrolysis. Polyphenol profiles were visualizedby their absorbance at 530 nm (FIG. 4A), 310 nm (FIG. 4B) and 280 nm(FIG. 4C).

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is of a fruit cell culture which hasanti-inflammatory properties, formulated for mucosal delivery.

Specifically, the fruit cell cultures of the present invention can beused to treat inflammatory disorders such as atherosclerosis.

The principles and operation of fruit cell cultures according to thepresent invention may be better understood with reference to thedrawings and accompanying descriptions.

Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, itis to be understood that the invention is not limited in its applicationto the details set forth in the following description or exemplified bythe Examples. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of beingpracticed or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understoodthat the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purposeof description and should not be regarded as limiting.

Nutrapharmaceuticals derived from polyphenol-containing fruit extractsare known for their anti-inflammatory effects. However, use of fruitextracts (e.g. grape extracts) as a source of these active agents islimited due to their high sugar content. Likewise use of red wine as asource of these regulatory constituents is limited due to its highalcoholic content. In addition, it has been shown that the therapeuticeffect of wine and wine grapes is dependant on species, location, year(annual climate), processing etc. and therefore reliance on red wine,grapes or grape seeds as a source of these regulatory compounds does notlend to a homogeneous or consistent supply of material. Furthermore,fruits are often contaminated by residual fungicides, pathogens,pesticides and pollutants.

In addition, the potential benefit of gastrointestinal delivery ofpolyphenols present in red wines and fruit extracts is limited by itsbioavailability to target tissues and cells. Due to marked differencesin their bioavailability while passing through the intestines, nocorrelation can be drawn between the abundance of a certain polyphenolin a given food and its concentration as an active compound in vivo.Absorbance of flavonoids in the small intestines, for example, rangesfrom 0-60% of the dose, and elimination half-lives range from 2-48hours. Most polyphenols undergo extensive metabolism in the intestine,and are present in serum and urine predominantly as glucuronides, methylor sulfate conjugates.

There is thus a need for novel natural (phyto) compositions which arebetter defined, consistent (e.g., clonal preparations), highlybioavailable and easily administered for the treatment of inflammatorydisorders.

While reducing the present invention to practice, the present inventorshave unexpectedly found that preparations derived from fruit (e.g.,grape) cell cultures comprise more potent anti-inflammatory activitiesthan either red wine or grape extracts. Such preparations may beformulated for mucosal delivery thereby enhancing the bioavailability ofthe active agents.

The present inventors have further devised a novel tool for theidentification of highly potent fruit cell cultures which may be usedfor the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

U.S. Pat. Appl. No. 20030100082 teaches a method of isolating activeagents (proanthocyanidins) from fruit cell cultures. In sharp contrastto the present invention, U.S. Pat. Appl. No. 20030100082 does not teachmucosal delivery of such agents for the treatment of inflammatorydisorders. Furthermore, as opposed to the active agents describedtherein, the active agents of the present invention do not requireextraction from fruit cell cultures. This provides a much simpler andless expensive process for the preparation of anti-inflammatorycompositions.

As is illustrated hereinbelow and in the Examples section which follows,the present inventors have shown that grape cell cultures of the presentinvention both decrease production of the inflammatory marker ET-1(FIG. 1) and increase the production of the anti-inflammatory markereNOS (FIG. 2) in a human endothelial cell culture to a greater extentthan both red wine and commercial grape extracts.

Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention there is provideda pharmaceutical composition including as an active ingredient a fruitcell culture and/or a preparation derived therefrom and apharmaceutically acceptable carrier suitable for mucosal delivery.

As used herein, the phrase “pharmaceutical composition” refers to apreparation of one or more, or of a mixture, of the active ingredientsdescribed herein (i.e., fruit cell culture as further describedhereinbelow) with other chemical components such as physiologicallysuitable carriers and excipients. The purpose of a pharmaceuticalcomposition is to facilitate administration of a compound to anorganism. Since the active ingredient is found in foods (i.e. fruit),the phrase “pharmaceutical composition” as used herein also refers to anutraceutical composition and/or a food additive.

Herein the term “active ingredient” refers to the fruit cell cultureaccountable for the anti-inflammatory effect. The anti-inflammatoryeffect of the fruit cell culture of the present invention may be derivedfrom an amount of active agents (e.g. polyphenols) comprised within or aparticular combination or ratio of active agents comprised within thefruit cell cultures.

As used herein, the phrase “fruit cell culture” refers to a single cellfruit culture (as used herein fruit cell-line culture or clonal culture)or a heterogeneous cell culture which comprises a number of cellsderived from fruits having different genotypes (e.g., differentvarieties) or a number of cell types or tissues derived from a singlefruit. The cell cultures of the present invention may be derived fromany part of the fruit e.g. fruit skin, fruit flesh, seed coat and seedflesh.

According to another aspect of the present invention, the cell culturemay be derived from any part of a plant including, but not limited toendosperm, aleurone layer, embryo (or its parts as scutellum andcotyledons), pericarp, stem, leaves, tubers, trichomes and roots.

Methods of culturing fruit cells are well known in the art. For example,methods of propagating grape cells are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.4,532,733 and 6,455,312. An exemplary method of producing a grape cellline culture is described in Example 1 of the Examples sectionhereinbelow. Briefly, fruit explants are dissected and cultured untilcalli are induced. The fruit explants may be dissected in the presenceof antioxidants. Examples of antioxidants and typical concentrationsthereof that may be used according to this aspect of the presentinvention include, but are not limited to PVP (0.5 and 1 g/l),L-cysteine (150 mg/l), gallic acid (1.5 mg/l), DTT (70 mg/l), biopterin(15 mg/l), ascorbic acid (150 mg/l) and citric acid (150 mg/l). Anexemplary medium which may be used to culture the fruit explants isMurashige and Skoog, MS medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962, Physiol Plant15:473-497), solidified with 0.25% Gelrite. The pH is typically adjustedto pH 5.9. In order to induce calli, other agents may be added to themedium such as casein hydrolisate, sucrose and inositol, Kinetin and NAA(α-naphthalenacetic acid).

Other exemplary media that may be used for calli induction of fruitcultures are listed herein below:

CP (Chee and Pool 1987, Scientia Horticulturae 32:85-95) salt andvitamins medium, also supplemented with 250 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 2%sucrose, 0.25% activated charcoal and 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). Forcallus induction it may be supplemented with 0.2 mg/l Kinetin and 0.1mg/l NAA (α-naphthalenacetic acid).

WPM (Woody Plant Medium), (Lloyd and McCown 1981, Int Plant Prop SocProc 30:421-427) salt and vitamins medium. This may be supplemented withfor example, 250 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 2% sucrose, 0.25% activatedcharcoal and 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). For callus induction it wasalso supplemented with 0.2 mg/l Kinetin and 0.1 mg/lNAA(α-naphthalenacetic acid).

B5 (Gamborg et al. 1968, In vitro 12:473-478) salt and vitamins mediummay be supplemented with for example 250 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 2%sucrose, 0.25% activated charcoal and 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). Forcallus induction it may be supplemented with 1 mg/l 2,4-D(2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and 0.2 mg/l BA (6-benzyladenine).

B5 (Gamborg et al. supra) salt and vitamins medium may be supplementedwith for example 250 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 6% sucrose, 0.25%activated charcoal and 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). For callus inductionit may be supplemented with 1 mg/l 2,4-D and 0.2 mg/l BA.

B5 (Gamborg et al. supra) salt and vitamins medium may also besupplemented with for example 1000 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 9% sucrose,0.25% activated charcoal and 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). For callusinduction it may be supplemented with 2 mg/l 2,4-D, 0.5 mg/lNAA, 0.2mg/l kinetin and 0.2 mg/l BA.

Typically, calli are visible from about ten days to four weeks followingculture initiation depending on the fruit explant. Calli may be selectedby color or some other physical property and subcultured for propagationin either liquid or solid cultures. In one embodiment red calli areselected from grape cultures as there is a higher content of polyphenolsand anthocyanins in the red callus. Agents such as DTT (e.g. 70 mg/l),ascorbic acid (150 mg/l) or citric acid (150 mg/l) may be added to theculture medium to prevent necrogenesis. Cultures are typicallysubcultured every 7-10 days to fresh growing media.

As mentioned herein above, the fruit cell cultures of the presentinvention have anti-inflammatory activities. Selection of theappropriate fruit may be tested by numerous assays for anti inflammatoryactivities (e.g., as described hereinbelow and in the Examples section).Preferably, the fruit cell cultures have higher anti-inflammatoryactivities than either red wine or commercial grape extract in anyparticular assay.

Preferably, the cell cultures are derived from fruits comprisingpolyphenols. As used herein the term “polyphenols” refers to naturallyoccurring phyto organic compounds having more than one phenol group.Polyphenols may range from simple molecules such as phenolic acid tolarge highly polymerized compounds such as tannins. The phenolic ringsof polyphenols are typically conjugated to various sugar molecules,organic acids and/or lipids. Differences in this conjugated chemicalstructure account for the chemical classification and variation in themodes of action and health properties of the various polyphenolcompounds. Examples of polyphenols include but are not limited to,anthocyanins, bioflavonoids (including the subclasses flavones,flavonols, isoflavones, flavanols, and flavanones), proanthocyanins,xanthones, phenolic acids, stilbenes and lignans.

Preferably, the fruits comprise at least 0.1% polyphenols, morepreferably at least 0.5% polyphenols, more preferably at least 1%polyphenols, more preferably at least 1.5% polyphenols, more preferablyat least 2% polyphenols, more preferably at least 3% polyphenols andeven more preferably 5% polyphenols. Examples of fruits that containpolyphenols include, but are not limited to grape, apple, blueberry,prune, cranberry, elderberry, bilberry, gentain, orange, mango, kiwi,pomegranate, blackberry, raspberry, strawberry, pear, cherry, plumstomato, grapefruit, pineapple, persimmon and evodia fruit.

According to a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the presentinvention, the fruit is a grape. The grape may be a colored grape (e.g.red, black, purple, blue and all color variations between).Alternatively, the grape may be a non-colored grape (e.g. green or whiteor any color variation between).

The fruit of this aspect of the present invention may be of a wild orcultivated variety. Examples of cultivated grapes include those grapesbelonging to the vitis genus. Examples of vitis varieties include, butare not limited to Vitis vinifera (V. vinifera), V. silvestris, V.muscadinia, V. rotundifolia, V. riparia, V. shuttleworthii, V. lubrisca,V. daviddi, V. amurensis, V. romanelli, V. aestivalis, V. Cynthiana, V.cineria, V. palmate, V. munsoniana, V. cordifolia, Hybrid A23-7-71, V.acerifolia, V. treleasei and V. betulifolia.

Modifications to enhance the anti-inflammatory profile or the growth ofthe fruit cell cultures are also contemplated as being within the scopeof the present invention and can be performed by one skilled in the art.

For instance, sucrose concentration may be increased in a medium (e.g.suspension medium) in order to increase the amount of pigmentedpolyphenols in the culture. Furthermore, nitrogen sources (e.g. NH₄NO₃)may be manipulated for so as to alter the polyphenol content in planttissue cultures (Neera et al., Phytochemistry, 31(12):4143-4149, 1992).For example, decreasing the concentration of nitrogen sources in fruitcell culture medium is believed to increase the production ofpolyphenols in the culture. In addition, infusion of certain amino acidsin the suspension medium, such as glutamine, glycine, and serine alsomay significantly affect the production of polyphenols in fruitcultures.

Lighting conditions can also be varied in order to achieve a modifiedpolyphenol content in fruit culture. For example, the lighting can bechanged by increasing irradiance or length of exposure to the light.Additionally, the frequency or duration of subculturing periods can beprolonged in order to improve or modify the yield of polyphenols. Otherfactors (e.g. growth factors) may also be added to the medium in orderto enhance the growth of the fruit cultures.

The fruit cell cultures may also be genetically modified so as toexpress other active agents. Examples of particularly useful activeagents that may be expressed include anti-inflammatory polypeptides,such as adolapin (Toxicon. 1982; 20(1):317-21), or CD4 polypeptides (seeU.S. Pat. No. 5,869,055); angiogenic polypeptides (e.g. VEGF,Platelet-derived Endothelial Cell Growth Factor, Angiogenin, basic andacidic Fibroblast Growth Factor (also known as Heparin Binding GrowthFactor I and II, respectively), Transforming Growth Factor-Beta,Platelet-derived Growth Factor, Hepatocyte Growth Factor, FibroblastGrowth Factor-18, prostaglandins PGE1 and PGE2, nicotinamide; andanalgesic polypeptides such as Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, andsubstance P.

Methods for genetically transforming plants are well known in the art.Such methods are generally described in Sambrook et al., MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, New York(1989, 1992), in Ausubel et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,John Wiley and Sons, Baltimore, Md. (1989), Chang et al., Somatic GeneTherapy, CRC Press, Ann Arbor, Mich. (1995), Vega et al., GeneTargeting, CRC Press, Ann Arbor Mich. (1995), Vectors: A Survey ofMolecular Cloning Vectors and Their Uses, Butterworths, Boston Mass.(1988) and Gilboa et at. [Biotechniques 4 (6): 504-512, 1986] andinclude, for example, stable or transient transfection, lipofection,electroporation and infection with recombinant viral vectors. Inaddition, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,464,764 and 5,487,992 forpositive-negative selection methods.

Fruit-specific promoters such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.5,753,475 and European Pat. No. EP 973 922 A2 may be used to drive geneexpression in the fruit cell cultures.

Introduction of nucleic acids by viral infection offers severaladvantages over other methods such as lipofection and electroporation,since higher transfection efficiency can be obtained due to theinfectious nature of viruses.

As mentioned, the composition of the present invention may comprise apreparation derived from the fruit cell culture.

As used herein the term “preparation” refers to the retrieved fruit cellcultures which are used in the pharmaceutical compositions of thepresent invention e.g., an extract.

Preparations may be derived from fresh or frozen fruit cell culturesusing any method known in the art so long as the preparations comprisethe active agents. The preparation may comprise all the culture oractive portions thereof (e.g., extract). The latter may be effected toincrease concentration of the active ingredients or to lose undesiredproperties (e.g., alcohol, taste or sugar content). Thus, the fruit cellcultures may be processed by blending, grinding under liquid nitrogenand/or drying. The active agents in the fruit cell cultures may bepurified prior to or following processing. Partial purification maycomprise, but is not limited to disrupting fruit cellular structuresthereby creating a composition comprising soluble fruit cell components,and insoluble fruit cell components which may be separated for example,but not limited to, by centrifugation, filtration or a combinationthereof. Partial purification may also comprise aqueous extraction ofsoluble active agents by precipitation with any suitable salt, forexample KHSO₄. Other methods may include large scale maceration andjuice extraction in order to permit the direct use of the extract.

Alternatively, purification of active agents from the fruit cell culturecan be effected using more sophisticated purification methods which arewell known in the art including but not limited to, ultra filtration,affinity chromatography and or electrophoresis.

Testing retainment of anti-inflammatory activity can be assayedfollowing processing as described hereinbelow.

According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, thepreparation is a dried preparation. Drying may be effected bylypophilization or placing in a heated oven e.g. at a temperaturebetween 40° C. to 60° C. Following drying, the preparation may befurther processed e.g. ground to a fine powder. The preparation may behydrophilic or hydrophobic.

Preferably, the fruit cell cultures do not include alcohol so as toavoid alcohol associated effects such as alcoholism, liver poisoning andheart failure. In order to avoid problems associated with sugar intake,(e.g. obesity, diabetes, tooth caries), the fruit cultures of thepresent invention, preferably contain less than 10% w/v sweeteningsugar. As used herein, the phrase “a sweetening sugar” refers to a sugarwhich provides a sweet taste e.g. sucrose and fructose. Preferably, thefruit cultures of the present invention comprise at least 2% w/vpolyphenols. Polyphenol content may be determined using methods known inthe art such as the spectrophotometric Folin-Ciocalteau test and redoxderivative potentiometric titration with electrogenerated chlorine.

The fruit cell cultures or preparation of the present invention may betasteful. However, according to a preferred aspect of the presentinvention, the fruit cell cultures are tasteless.

Methods of analyzing taste are well known in the art. For example, thefruit cell cultures may be subjected to an in vivo taste assay withhuman subjects i.e. a taste panel as described in Example 4 hereinbelow.Typically a significant number and cross-section of people blindly tastethe fruit cultures of the present invention and decide accordingly onthe taste. The results are statistically analyzed using parametric ornon-parametric methods. In order to eliminate the influence of thedifference among individual panelists and their physical conditions, invitro and automated systems are also available to measure taste. Thus,U.S. Pat. No. 6,942,874 teaches an in vitro taste assay which may beused according to this aspect of the present invention to ascertainwhether the fruit cell cultures comprise a taste. Artificial lipidmembrane taste sensors are also available for performing tasterecognition by measuring membrane potentials on artificial lipidmembranes and polymers. Alpha M.O.S. (Toulouse, France) has developed ane-tongue which makes an analysis of the total complex chemistry of thesample (Chemical Fingerprint). The sensors have been specificallyformulated to correlate to various taste attributes. Through acombination of sensor types a sensor array that is specifically focusedfor the pharmaceutical applications has been specified and validated.Other sensor combinations are also configurable.

As mentioned, the fruit cell cultures and/or preparations derivedtherefrom may be assayed for anti-inflammatory activity. Such methodsare known in the art. The assays may be in-vitro or in-vivo. Examples ofin-vitro anti-inflammatory assays which may be used to assess the fruitcell cultures of the present invention include inhibition ofcyclooxygenase 2 activity or an increase in quinone reductase activity.Particularly preferred are the in-vitro assays which measure an increasein eNOS activity and decrease in ET-1 activity of cultured endothelialcells. Such methods are described below in Example 3.

An example of an in-vivo assay which may be used for measuringanti-inflammatory activity of the fruit cell cultures of the presentinvention is the Carrageenan-induced paw edema test. In this assay, pawedema is induced by injecting a volume (e.g. 100 μl or 40 μl (rats ormice, respectively) of a 1% solution of X-carrageenan (Sigma, USA) innormal saline into the plantar surface of the left hind paw of the rats.The change in paw volumes following carrageenan administration invehicle treated animals or animals treated with the fruit cell cultureor preparation derived therefrom is measured by caliper. Theanti-inflammatory activity is typically expressed as percent inhibitionof paw edema.

Another example of an in-vivo assay which may be used for measuringanti-inflammatory activity of the fruit cell cultures of the presentinvention is the arachidonic-acid-induced inflammation of the externalear. In this assay, inflammation of the external ear is assessed bymeasuring tissue swelling after topical application of arachidonic acid.The acid is typically applied to the inner surface of the external earand the opposite ear serves as control. Ear thickness may be determinedusing a caliper over a period of time, starting immediately followingarachidonic acid application. The fruit cell cultures may beadministered prior to or concomitant with arachidonic acidadministration.

As mentioned herein above, in order to enhance bioavailability of theactive agents present in the fruit cultures, the fruit cell cultures ofthe present invention together with a pharmaceutically acceptablecarrier are formulated for mucosal delivery.

Hereinafter, the phrases “physiologically acceptable carrier” and“pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” which may be interchangeably usedrefer to a carrier or a diluent that does not cause significantirritation to an organism and does not abrogate the biological activityand properties of the administered compound. An adjuvant is includedunder these phrases.

As used herein the phrase “mucosal delivery” refers to the delivery ofan active ingredient in which active ingredient is introduced to thebody across a mucous membrane which allows for the avoidance of thegastrointestinal tract and first pass liver metabolism and consequentlyallows the agent to directly enter into the circulation. This caninclude passage through the gastrointestinal tract as by oral ingestion,but refers to delivery through the mucosa of such locus i.e. thepharynx. Examples of mucosal delivery include but are not limited tomouth delivery, pharynx delivery, esophagus delivery, rectal deliveryand vaginal delivery.

It has been shown that most polyphenols undergo extensive metabolism inthe intestine, and are present in serum and urine predominantly asinactive glucuronides, methyl or sulfate conjugates. The presentinventors have hypothesized that mucosal delivery of the fruit cellcultures of the present invention will enhance bioavailability of activeagents comprised within thereby boosting the anti-inflammatory effects.

Preferably, the site of delivery is via the mouth. Recent epidemiologicevidence supports this view since dietary flavonoids have been shown tobe activated by the saliva in the mouth (Browning et al, 2005, J. Pharm.Pharmacol. 57:1037-42). Mucosal delivery via the mouth may be affectedby sublingual delivery, which is systemic delivery of active agentsthrough the mucosal membranes lining the floor of the mouth or buccaldelivery, which is agent administration through the mucosal membraneslining the cheeks (buccal mucosa). Formulations which are particularlyuseful for mouth mucosal delivery include, but are not limited tomouthwashes, strips, foams, chewing gums, oral sprays, lozenges, foods,toothpaste and capsules. A particularly preferred formulation is achewing gum.

The formulations, e.g. chewing gums can be low or high moisture, sugaror sugarless, wax containing or wax free, low calorie (via high base orlow calorie bulking agents), and/or may contain dental agents.

The active agents of the present invention may also be encapsulated orentrapped to give a delayed release from the mucosal formulations. Anystandard technique which gives partial or full encapsulation of theactive agents can be used. These techniques include, but are not limitedto, spray drying, spray chilling, fluid-bed coating and coacervation.These encapsulation techniques may be used individually in a single stepprocess or in any combination in a multiple step process.

Other methods of providing delayed release formulations include, but arenot limited to agglomeration to give partial encapsulation, fixation orabsorption which also gives partial encapsulation, and entrapment intoan extruded compound.

The amount of coating or encapsulating material on the active agent alsomay control the length of time for its release from chewing gum.

Generally, the higher the level of coating and the lower the amount ofactive agent, the slower the release. Methods and materials forformulating delayed release formulations are known in the art. Example,PCT Pat. App. publication No. WO 00/35298 teaches methods and materialsfor formulating delayed release formulations in chewing gums.

The active agents of the present invention (i.e. active agents derivedfrom a particular fruit cell culture) may be formulated in differentways and administered via the same vehicle. For example, the activeagents could be encapsulated for fast release, moderate release, andslow release in the same vehicle. Furthermore the active agents of thepresent invention may be added to a gum coating for fast release andalso added to the gum center with or without encapsulation for slowrelease.

Faster absorption may be affected by increasing flavor levels as well asthe addition of other flavor components, such as menthol and mentholderivatives, limonene, carvone, isomenthol, eucalyptol, menthone,pynene, camphor and camphor derivatives, as well as monoterpene naturalproducts, monoterpene derivatives, and sesquaterpenes, includingcaryophyllene and copaene.

The formulations may include other agents which enhance the penetrationof the active agents through the mucous and into the blood. Examples ofsuch agents include, but are not limited to 23-lauryl ether, Aprotinin,Azone, Benzalkonium chloride, Cetylpyridinium chloride,Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, Cyclodextrin, Dextran sulfate, Lauricacid, Lauric acid/Propylene glycol, Lysophosphatidylcholine, Menthol,Methoxysalicylate, Methyloleate, Oleic acid, Phosphatidylcholine,Polyoxyethylene, Polysorbate 80, Sodium EDTA, Sodium glycocholate,Sodium glycodeoxycholate, Sodium lauryl sulfate, Sodium salicylate,Sodium taurocholate, Sodium taurodeoxycholate, Sulfoxides and variousalkyl glycosides.

Other modifications may also affect the release rate of the activeagents into the mucosa. Texture modifiers to soften base may give fasterrelease where hard bases may give slower release. Addition of alkalinematerials such as sodium bicarbonate or sodium hydroxide may make thesaliva slightly alkaline, which may increase buccal/lingual absorptionof the medicament into the bloodstream.

Release of the active agents of the present invention may also beaffected by the shape and size of the formulation. For example, flatstick pieces of gum with large surface area may release actives fasterinto saliva from gum when chewed, whereas round or cube pieces mayrelease medicaments and actives more slowly.

Tableting of chewing gum is disclosed in U.K. Patent Publication No.1,489,832; U.S. Pat. No. 4,753,805; EP Patent Publication No. 0 221 850;and Italy Patent Publication No. 1,273,487. These patents discloseactive agents added to chewing gum which is then tableted.

Coloring agents may also be added to the formulations. Coloring agentscontemplated by the present invention include food quality dyes. Filmformers preferably added to the syrup include methyl cellulose,gelatins, hydroxypropyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose and the like and combinationsthereof. According to a preferred embodiment, fruit cell cultures of thepresent invention are provided in a non-coloring concentration.

As mentioned above, the fruit cell cultures of the present invention maybe tasteful and agents which offset a bitter taste may be added e.g.sodium salts. In addition, sweeteners may be added. The sweeteners maycomprise sugarless or sugar-containing components.

For administration by nasal inhalation, the active ingredients for useaccording to the present invention may be conveniently delivered in theform of an aerosol spray presentation from a pressurized pack or anebulizer with the use of a suitable propellant, e.g.,dichlorodifluoromethane, trichlorofluoromethane,dichloro-tetrafluoroethane or carbon dioxide. In the case of apressurized aerosol, the dosage unit may be determined by providing avalve to deliver a metered amount. Capsules and cartridges of, e.g.,gelatin for use in a dispenser may be formulated containing a powder mixof the compound and a suitable powder base such as lactose or starch.

The preparation of the present invention may also be formulated inrectal compositions such as suppositories or retention enemas, using,e.g., conventional suppository bases such as cocoa butter or otherglycerides.

As mentioned hereinabove, the fruit cell cultures of the presentinvention and preparations derived therefrom may also be provided asfood additives and ingested orally.

The phrase “food additive” [defined by the FDA in 21 C.F.R. 170.3(e)(1)]includes any liquid or solid material intended to be added to a foodproduct. This material can, for example, include an agent having adistinct taste and/or flavor or a physiological effect (e.g., vitamins).In addition the fruit cell cultures and preparations derived therefrommay be provided to animals as feed additives.

The food additive composition of the present invention can be added to avariety of food products. Preferably, the fruit cell cultures of thepresent invention are added to foods which are retained in the mouthprior to swallowing so as to enhance mucosal delivery. Examples of suchfoods include chocolates, sweets and ice-creams.

As used herein, the phrase “food product” describes a materialconsisting essentially of protein, carbohydrate and/or fat, which isused in the body of an organism to sustain growth, repair and vitalprocesses and to furnish energy. Food products may also containsupplementary substances such as minerals, vitamins and condiments. SeeMerriani-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Edition, 1993. The phrase“food product” as used herein further includes a beverage adapted forhuman or animal consumption.

A food product containing the food additive of the present invention canalso include additional additives such as, for example, antioxidants,sweeteners, flavorings, colors, preservatives, nutritive additives suchas vitamins and minerals, amino acids (i.e. essential amino acids),emulsifiers, pH control agents such as acidulants, hydrocolloids,antifoams and release agents, flour improving or strengthening agents,raising or leavening agents, gases and chelating agents, the utility andeffects of which are well-known in the art.

According to another aspect of the present invention, grape cell linecultures and preparations derived therefrom may be formulated for othermodes of delivery including oral, intestinal or parenteral delivery,including intramuscular, subcutaneous and intramedullary injections aswell as intrathecal, direct intraventricular, intravenous,inrtaperitoneal, intranasal, or intraocular injections.

For injection, the active ingredients of the pharmaceutical compositionmay be formulated in aqueous solutions, preferably in physiologicallycompatible buffers such as Hank's solution, Ringer's solution, orphysiological salt buffer.

Thus the grape cell cultures and preparations derived therefromdescribed herein may be formulated for parenteral administration, e.g.,by bolus injection or continuous infusion. Formulations for injectionmay be presented in unit dosage form, e.g., in ampoules or in multidosecontainers with optionally, an added preservative. The compositions maybe suspensions, solutions or emulsions in oily or aqueous vehicles, andmay contain formulatory agents such as suspending, stabilizing and/ordispersing agents.

Pharmaceutical compositions for parenteral administration includeaqueous solutions of the active compound in water-soluble form.Additionally, suspensions of the active compounds may be prepared asappropriate oily injection suspensions. Suitable lipophilic solvents orvehicles include fatty oils such as sesame oil, or synthetic fatty acidsesters such as ethyl oleate, triglycerides or liposomes. Aqueousinjection suspensions may contain substances, which increase theviscosity of the suspension, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose,sorbitol or dextran. Optionally, the suspension may also containsuitable stabilizers or agents which increase the solubility of theconjugates to allow for the preparation of highly concentratedsolutions.

Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for use in context of the presentinvention include compositions wherein the active ingredients arecontained in an amount effective to achieve the intended purpose. Morespecifically, a therapeutically effective amount means an amount ofactive ingredients (fruit cell culture) effective to prevent, alleviateor ameliorate symptoms of a disorder (e.g., atherosclerosis) or prolongthe survival of the subject being treated.

Determination of a therapeutically effective amount is well within thecapability of those skilled in the art, especially in light of thedetailed disclosure provided herein.

For any preparation used in the methods of the invention, thetherapeutically effective amount or dose can be estimated initially fromin vitro and cell culture assays such as the ET-1 and eNOS cell cultureassays described in Example 3 hereinbelow. For example, a dose can beformulated in animal models to achieve a desired concentration or titer.Such information can be used to more accurately determine useful dosesin humans.

Toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of the active ingredients describedherein can be determined by standard pharmaceutical procedures in vitro,in cell cultures or experimental animals. The data obtained from thesein vitro and cell culture assays and animal studies can be used informulating a range of dosage for use in human. The dosage may varydepending upon the dosage form employed and the route of administrationutilized. The exact formulation, route of administration and dosage canbe chosen by the individual physician in view of the patient'scondition. (See e.g., Fingl, et al., 1975, in “The Pharmacological Basisof Therapeutics”, Ch. 1 p. 1).

Dosage amount and interval may be adjusted individually to provideplasma or brain levels of the active ingredient are sufficient to induceor suppress the biological effect (minimal effective concentration,MEC). The MEC will vary for each preparation, but can be estimated fromin vitro data. Dosages necessary to achieve the MEC will depend onindividual characteristics and route of administration. Detection assayscan be used to determine plasma concentrations.

Depending on the severity and responsiveness of the condition to betreated, dosing can be of a single or a plurality of administrations,with course of treatment lasting from several days to several weeks oruntil cure is effected or diminution of the disease state is achieved.

The amount of a composition to be administered will, of course, bedependent on the subject being treated, the severity of the affliction,the manner of administration, the judgment of the prescribing physician,etc.

Compositions including the preparation of the present inventionformulated in a compatible pharmaceutical carrier may also be prepared,placed in an appropriate container, and labeled for treatment of anindicated condition.

Compositions of the present invention may, if desired, be presented in apack or dispenser device, such as an FDA approved kit, which may containone or more unit dosage forms containing the active ingredient. The packmay, for example, comprise metal or plastic foil, such as a blisterpack. The pack or dispenser device may be accompanied by instructionsfor administration. The pack or dispenser may also be accommodated by anotice associated with the container in a form prescribed by agovernmental agency regulating the manufacture, use or sale ofpharmaceuticals, which notice is reflective of approval by the agency ofthe form of the compositions or human or veterinary administration. Suchnotice, for example, may be of labeling approved by the U.S. Food andDrug Administration for prescription drugs or of an approved productinsert.

Since the fruit cell cultures of the present invention compriseanti-inflammatory activities, they may be used for treating a diseasewhich is associated with inflammation.

Thus, according to another aspect of the present invention there isprovided a method of treating an inflammatory disorder, comprisingmucosally administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeuticallyeffective amount of a fruit cell culture and/or a preparation derivedtherefrom thereby treating the inflammatory disorder.

As used herein the term “treating” refers to the prevention of some orall of the symptoms associated with an inflammatory disease, a conditionor disorder. The term “treating” also refers to alleviating the symptomsor underlying cause of an inflammatory disease, prolongation of lifeexpectancy of patients having a disease, as well as complete recoveryfrom a disease.

As used herein the phrase “inflammatory disorder” includes but is notlimited to chronic inflammatory diseases and disorders and acuteinflammatory diseases and disorders. Examples of such diseases andconditions are summarized infra.

Inflammatory Diseases Associated with Hypersensitivity

Examples of hypersensitivity include, but are not limited to, Type Ihypersensitivity, Type II hypersensitivity, Type III hypersensitivity,Type IV hypersensitivity, immediate hypersensitivity, antibody mediatedhypersensitivity, immune complex mediated hypersensitivity, T lymphocytemediated hypersensitivity and DTH.

Type I or immediate hypersensitivity, such as asthma.

Type II hypersensitivity include, but are not limited to, rheumatoiddiseases, rheumatoid autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis (Krenn V.et al., Histol Histopathol 2000 July; 15 (3):791), spondylitis,ankylosing spondylitis (Jan Voswinkel et al., Arthritis Res 2001; 3 (3):189), systemic diseases, systemic autoimmune diseases, systemic lupuserythematosus (Erikson J. et al., Immunol Res 1998; 17 (1-2):49),sclerosis, systemic sclerosis (Renaudineau Y. et al., Clin Diagn LabImmunol. 1999 March; 6 (2):156); Chan O T. et al., Immunol Rev 1999June; 169:107), glandular diseases, glandular autoimmune diseases,pancreatic autoimmune diseases, diabetes, Type I diabetes (Zimmet P.Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1996 October; 34 Suppl:S125), thyroid diseases,autoimmune thyroid diseases, Graves' disease (Orgiazzi J. EndocrinolMetab Clin North Am 2000 June; 29 (2):339), thyroiditis, spontaneousautoimmune thyroiditis (Braley-Mullen H. and Yu S, J Immunol 2000 Dec.15; 165 (12):7262), Hashimoto's thyroiditis (Toyoda N. et al., NipponRinsho 1999 August; 57 (8):1810), myxedema, idiopathic myxedema (MitsumaT. Nippon Rinsho. 1999 August; 57 (8):1759); autoimmune reproductivediseases, ovarian diseases, ovarian autoimmunity (Garza K M. et al., JReprod Immunol 1998 February; 37 (2):87), autoimmune anti-sperminfertility (Diekman A B. et al., Am J Reprod Immunol. 2000 March; 43(3):134), repeated fetal loss (Tincani A. et al., Lupus 1998; 7 Suppl2:S107-9), neurodegenerative diseases, neurological diseases,neurological autoimmune diseases, multiple sclerosis (Cross A H. et al.,J Neuroimmunol 2001 Jan. 1; 112 (1-2):1), Alzheimer's disease (Oron L.et al., J Neural Transm Suppl. 1997; 49:77), myasthenia gravis (InfanteA J. And Kraig E, Int Rev Immunol 1999; 18 (1-2):83), motor neuropathies(Kornberg A J. J Clin Neurosci. 2000 May; 7 (3):191), Guillain-Barresyndrome, neuropathies and autoimmune neuropathies (Kusunoki S. Am JMed. Sci. 2000 April; 319 (4):234), myasthenic diseases, Lambert-Eatonmyasthenic syndrome (Takamori M. Am J Med. Sci. 2000 April; 319(4):204), paraneoplastic neurological diseases, cerebellar atrophy,paraneoplastic cerebellar atrophy, non-paraneoplastic stiff mansyndrome, cerebellar atrophies, progressive cerebellar atrophies,encephalitis, Rasmussen's encephalitis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,Sydeham chorea, Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, polyendocrinopathies,autoimmune polyendocrinopathies (Antoine J C. and Honnorat J. Rev Neurol(Paris) 2000 January; 156 (1):23); neuropathies, dysimmune neuropathies(Nobile-Orazio E. et al., Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl1999; 50:419); neuromyotonia, acquired neuromyotonia, arthrogryposismultiplex congenita (Vincent A. et al., Ann N Y Acad. Sci. 1998 May 13;841:482), cardiovascular diseases, cardiovascular autoimmune diseases,atherosclerosis (Matsuura E. et al., Lupus. 1998; 7 Suppl 2:S135),myocardial infarction (Vaarala O. Lupus. 1998; 7 Suppl 2:S132),thrombosis (Tincani A. et al., Lupus 1998; 7 Suppl 2:S107-9),granulomatosis, Wegener's granulomatosis, arteritis, Takayasu'sarteritis and Kawasaki syndrome (Praprotnik S. et al., Wien KlinWochenschr 2000 Aug. 25; 112 (15-16):660); anti-factor VIII autoimmunedisease (Lacroix-Desmazes S. et al., Semin Thromb Hemost. 2000; 26(2):157); vasculitises, necrotizing small vessel vasculitises,microscopic polyangiitis, Churg and Strauss syndrome,glomerulonephritis, pauci-immune focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis,crescentic glomerulonephritis (Noel L H. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 2000May; 151 (3):178); antiphospholipid syndrome (Flamholz R. et al., J ClinApheresis 1999; 14 (4):171); heart failure, agonist-likebeta-adrenoceptor antibodies in heart failure (Wallukat G. et al., Am J.Cardiol. 1999 Jun. 17; 83 (12A):75H), thrombocytopenic purpura (MocciaF. Ann Ital Med. Int. 1999 April-June; 14 (2):114); hemolytic anemia,autoimmune hemolytic anemia (Efremov D G. et al., Leuk Lymphoma 1998January; 28 (3-4):285), gastrointestinal diseases, autoimmune diseasesof the gastrointestinal tract, intestinal diseases, chronic inflammatoryintestinal disease (Garcia Herola A. et al., Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000January; 23 (1):16), celiac disease (Landau Y E. and Shoenfeld Y.Harefuah 2000 Jan. 16; 138 (2):122), autoimmune diseases of themusculature, myositis, autoimmune myositis, Sjogren's syndrome (Feist E.et al., Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000 September; 123 (1):92); smoothmuscle autoimmune disease (Zauli D. et al., Biomed Pharmacother 1999June; 53 (5-6):234), hepatic diseases, hepatic autoimmune diseases,autoimmune hepatitis (Manns M P. J Hepatol 2000 August; 33 (2):326) andprimary biliary cirrhosis (Strassburg C P. et al., Eur J GastroenterolHepatol. 1999 June; 11 (6):595).

Type IV or T cell mediated hypersensitivity, include, but are notlimited to, rheumatoid diseases, rheumatoid arthritis (Tisch R, McDevittH O. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994 Jan. 18; 91 (2):437), systemicdiseases, systemic autoimmune diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus(Datta S K., Lupus 1998; 7 (9):591), glandular diseases, glandularautoimmune diseases, pancreatic diseases, pancreatic autoimmunediseases, Type 1 diabetes (Castano L. and Eisenbarth G S. Ann. Rev.Immunol. 8:647); thyroid diseases, autoimmune thyroid diseases, Graves'disease (Sakata S. et al., Mol Cell Endocrinol 1993 March; 92 (1):77);ovarian diseases (Garza K M. et al., J Reprod Immunol 1998 February; 37(2):87), prostatitis, autoimmune prostatitis (Alexander R B. et al.,Urology 1997 December; 50 (6):893), polyglandular syndrome, autoimmunepolyglandular syndrome, Type I autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (HaraT. et al., Blood. 1991 Mar. 1; 77 (5):1127), neurological diseases,autoimmune neurological diseases, multiple sclerosis, neuritis, opticneuritis (Soderstrom M. et al., J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994 May;57 (5):544), myasthenia gravis (Oshima M. et al., Eur J Immunol 1990December; 20 (12):2563), stiff-man syndrome (Hiemstra H S. et al., ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 2001 Mar. 27; 98 (7):3988), cardiovascular diseases,cardiac autoimmunity in Chagas' disease (Cunha-Neto E. et al., J ClinInvest 1996 Oct. 15; 98 (8):1709), autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura(Semple J W. et al., Blood 1996 May 15; 87 (10):4245), anti-helper Tlymphocyte autoimmunity (Caporossi A P. et al., Viral Immunol 1998; 11(1):9), hemolytic anemia (Sallah S. et al., Ann Hematol 1997 March; 74(3):139), hepatic diseases, hepatic autoimmune diseases, hepatitis,chronic active hepatitis (Franco A. et al., Clin Immunol Immunopathol1990 March; 54 (3):382), biliary cirrhosis, primary biliary cirrhosis(Jones D E. Clin Sci (Colch) 1996 November; 91 (5):551), nephricdiseases, nephric autoimmune diseases, nephritis, interstitial nephritis(Kelly C J. J Am Soc Nephrol 1990 August; 1 (2):140), connective tissuediseases, ear diseases, autoimmune connective tissue diseases,autoimmune ear disease (Yoo T J. et al., Cell Immunol 1994 August; 157(1):249), disease of the inner ear (Gloddek B. et al., Ann N Y Acad Sci1997 Dec. 29; 830:266), skin diseases, cutaneous diseases, dermaldiseases, bullous skin diseases, pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoidand pemphigus foliaceus.

Examples of delayed type hypersensitivity include, but are not limitedto, contact dermatitis and drug eruption.

Examples of types of T lymphocyte mediating hypersensitivity include,but are not limited to, helper T lymphocytes and cytotoxic Tlymphocytes.

Examples of helper T lymphocyte-mediated hypersensitivity include, butare not limited to, T_(h)1 lymphocyte mediated hypersensitivity andT_(h)2 lymphocyte mediated hypersensitivity.

Autoimmune Diseases

Include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular diseases, rheumatoiddiseases, glandular diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, cutaneousdiseases, hepatic diseases, neurological diseases, muscular diseases,nephric diseases, diseases related to reproduction, connective tissuediseases and systemic diseases.

Examples of autoimmune cardiovascular diseases include, but are notlimited to atherosclerosis (Matsuura E. et al., Lupus. 1998; 7 Suppl2:S135), myocardial infarction (Vaarala O. Lupus. 1998; 7 Suppl 2:S132),thrombosis (Tincani A. et al., Lupus 1998; 7 Suppl 2:S107-9), Wegener'sgranulomatosis, Takayasu's arteritis, Kawasaki syndrome (Praprotnik S.et al., Wien Klin Wochenschr 2000 Aug. 25; 112 (15-16):660), anti-factorVIII autoimmune disease (Lacroix-Desmazes S. et al., Semin ThrombHemost. 2000; 26 (2):157), necrotizing small vessel vasculitis,microscopic polyangiitis, Churg and Strauss syndrome, pauci-immune focalnecrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis (Noel L H. Ann Med Interne(Paris). 2000 May; 151 (3):178), antiphospholipid syndrome (Flamholz R.et al., J Clin Apheresis 1999; 14 (4):171), antibody-induced heartfailure (Wallukat G. et al., Am J. Cardiol. 1999 Jun. 17; 83 (12A):75H),thrombocytopenic purpura (Moccia F. Ann Ital Med. Int. 1999 April-June;14 (2):114; Semple J W. et al., Blood 1996 May 15; 87 (10):4245),autoimmune hemolytic anemia (Efremov D G. et al., Leuk Lymphoma 1998January; 28 (3-4):285; Sallah S. et al., Ann Hematol 1997 March; 74(3):139), cardiac autoimmunity in Chagas' disease (Cunha-Neto E. et al.,J Clin Invest 1996 Oct. 15; 98 (8):1709) and anti-helper T lymphocyteautoimmunity (Caporossi A P. et al., Viral Immunol 1998; 11 (1):9).

Examples of autoimmune rheumatoid diseases include, but are not limitedto rheumatoid arthritis (Krenn V. et al., Histol Histopathol 2000 July;15 (3):791; Tisch R, McDevitt H O. Proc Natl Acad Sci units S A 1994Jan. 18; 91 (2):437) and ankylosing spondylitis (Jan Voswinkel et al.,Arthritis Res 2001; 3 (3): 189).

Examples of autoimmune glandular diseases include, but are not limitedto, pancreatic disease, Type I diabetes, thyroid disease, Graves'disease, thyroiditis, spontaneous autoimmune thyroiditis, Hashimoto'sthyroiditis, idiopathic myxedema, ovarian autoimmunity, autoimmuneanti-sperm infertility, autoimmune prostatitis and Type I autoimmunepolyglandular syndrome. diseases include, but are not limited toautoimmune diseases of the pancreas, Type 1 diabetes (Castano L. andEisenbarth G S. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 8:647; Zimmet P. Diabetes Res ClinPract 1996 October; 34 Suppl:S125), autoimmune thyroid diseases, Graves'disease (Orgiazzi J. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2000 June; 29(2):339; Sakata S. et al., Mol Cell Endocrinol 1993 March; 92 (1):77),spontaneous autoimmune thyroiditis (Braley-Mullen H. and Yu S, J Immunol2000 Dec. 15; 165 (12):7262), Hashimoto's thyroiditis (Toyoda N. et al.,Nippon Rinsho 1999 August; 57 (8):1810), idiopathic myxedema (Mitsuma T.Nippon Rinsho. 1999 August; 57 (8):1759), ovarian autoimmunity (Garza KM. et al., J Reprod Immunol 1998 February; 37 (2):87), autoimmuneanti-sperm infertility (Diekman A B. et al., Am J Reprod Immunol. 2000March; 43 (3):134), autoimmune prostatitis (Alexander R B. et al.,Urology 1997 December; 50 (6):893) and Type I autoimmune polyglandularsyndrome (Hara T. et al., Blood. 1991 Mar. 1; 77 (5):1127).

Examples of autoimmune gastrointestinal diseases include, but are notlimited to, chronic inflammatory intestinal diseases (Garcia Herola A.et al., Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 January; 23 (1):16), celiac disease(Landau Y E. and Shoenfeld Y. Harefuah 2000 Jan. 16; 138 (2):122),colitis, ileitis and Crohn's disease.

Examples of autoimmune cutaneous diseases include, but are not limitedto, autoimmune bullous skin diseases, such as, but are not limited to,pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus foliaceus.

Examples of autoimmune hepatic diseases include, but are not limited to,hepatitis, autoimmune chronic active hepatitis (Franco A. et al., ClinImmunol Immunopathol 1990 March; 54 (3):382), primary biliary cirrhosis(Jones D E. Clin Sci (Colch) 1996 November; 91 (5):551; Strassburg C P.et al., Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 June; 11 (6):595) andautoimmune hepatitis (Manns M P. J Hepatol 2000 August; 33 (2):326).

Examples of autoimmune neurological diseases include, but are notlimited to, multiple sclerosis (Cross A H. et al., J Neuroimmunol 2001Jan. 1; 112 (1-2):1), Alzheimer's disease (Oron L. et al., J NeuralTransm Suppl. 1997; 49:77), myasthenia gravis (Infante A J. And Kraig E,Int Rev Immunol 1999; 18 (1-2):83; Oshima M. et al., Eur J Immunol 1990December; 20 (12):2563), neuropathies, motor neuropathies (Kornberg A J.J Clin Neurosci. 2000 May; 7 (3):191); Guillain-Barre syndrome andautoimmune neuropathies (Kusunoki S. Am J Med. Sci. 2000 April; 319(4):234), myasthenia, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (Takamori M. AmJ Med. Sci. 2000 April; 319 (4):204); paraneoplastic neurologicaldiseases, cerebellar atrophy, paraneoplastic cerebellar atrophy andstiff-man syndrome (Hiemstra H S. et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci units S A2001 Mar. 27; 98 (7):3988); non-paraneoplastic stiff man syndrome,progressive cerebellar atrophies, encephalitis, Rasmussen'sencephalitis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Sydeham chorea, Gilles dela Tourette syndrome and autoimmune polyendocrinopathies (Antoine J C.and Honnorat J. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2000 January; 156 (1):23); dysimmuneneuropathies (Nobile-Orazio E. et al., Electroencephalogr ClinNeurophysiol Suppl 1999; 50:419); acquired neuromyotonia, arthrogryposismultiplex congenita (Vincent A. et al., Ann N Y Acad. Sci. 1998 May 13;841:482), neuritis, optic neuritis (Soderstrom M. et al., J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry 1994 May; 57 (5):544) and neurodegenerativediseases.

Examples of autoimmune muscular diseases include, but are not limitedto, myositis, autoimmune myositis and primary Sjogren's syndrome (FeistE. et al., Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000 September; 123 (1):92) andsmooth muscle autoimmune disease (Zauli D. et al., Biomed Pharmacother1999 June; 53 (5-6):234).

Examples of autoimmune nephric diseases include, but are not limited to,nephritis and autoimmune interstitial nephritis (Kelly C J. J Am SocNephrol 1990 August; 1 (2):140).

Examples of autoimmune diseases related to reproduction include, but arenot limited to, repeated fetal loss (Tincani A. et al., Lupus 1998; 7Suppl 2:S107-9).

Examples of autoimmune connective tissue diseases include, but are notlimited to, ear diseases, autoimmune ear diseases (Yoo T J. et al., CellImmunol 1994 August; 157 (1):249) and autoimmune diseases of the innerear (Gloddek B. et al., Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997 Dec. 29; 830:266).

Examples of autoimmune systemic diseases include, but are not limitedto, systemic lupus erythematosus (Erikson J. et al., Immunol Res 1998;17 (1-2):49) and systemic sclerosis (Renaudineau Y. et al., Clin DiagnLab Immunol. 1999 March; 6 (2):156); Chan O T. et al., Immunol Rev 1999June; 169:107).

Infectious Diseases

Examples of infectious diseases include, but are not limited to, chronicinfectious diseases, subacute infectious diseases, acute infectiousdiseases, viral diseases, bacterial diseases, protozoan diseases,parasitic diseases, fungal diseases, mycoplasma diseases and priondiseases.

Graft Rejection Diseases

Examples of diseases associated with transplantation of a graft include,but are not limited to, graft rejection, chronic graft rejection,subacute graft rejection, hyperacute graft rejection, acute graftrejection and graft versus host disease.

Allergic Diseases

Examples of allergic diseases include, but are not limited to, asthma,hives, urticaria, pollen allergy, dust mite allergy, venom allergy,cosmetics allergy, latex allergy, chemical allergy, drug allergy, insectbite allergy, animal dander allergy, stinging plant allergy, poison ivyallergy and food allergy.

Cancerous Diseases

Examples of cancer include but are not limited to carcinoma, lymphoma,blastoma, sarcoma, and leukemia. Particular examples of cancerousdiseases but are not limited to: Myeloid leukemia such as Chronicmyelogenous leukemia. Acute myelogenous leukemia with maturation. Acutepromyelocytic leukemia, Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with increasedbasophils, Acute monocytic leukemia. Acute myelomonocytic leukemia witheosinophilia; Malignant lymphoma, such as Birkitt's Non-Hodgkin's;Lymphoctyic leukemia, such as Acute lumphoblastic leukemia. Chroniclymphocytic leukemia; Myeloproliferative diseases, such as Solid tumorsBenign Meningioma, Mixed tumors of salivary gland, Colonic adenomas;Adenocarcinomas, such as Small cell lung cancer, Kidney, Uterus,Prostate, Bladder, Ovary, Colon, Sarcomas, Liposarcoma, myxoid, Synovialsarcoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma (alveolar), Extraskeletel myxoidchonodrosarcoma, Ewing's tumor; other include Testicular and ovariandysgerminoma, Retinoblastoma, Wilms' tumor, Neuroblastoma, Malignantmelanoma, Mesothelioma, breast, skin, prostate, and ovarian.

According to a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the presentinvention, the disorder is atherosclerosis or an inflammatory disease ofthe mouth or gums.

Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the presentinvention will become apparent to one ordinarily skilled in the art uponexamination of the following examples, which are not intended to belimiting. Additionally, each of the various embodiments and aspects ofthe present invention as delineated hereinabove and as claimed in theclaims section below finds experimental support in the followingexamples.

EXAMPLES

Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with theabove descriptions, illustrate the invention in a non limiting fashion.

Generally, the nomenclature used herein and the laboratory proceduresutilized in the present invention include molecular, biochemical,microbiological and recombinant DNA techniques. Such techniques arethoroughly explained in the literature. See, for example, “MolecularCloning: A laboratory Manual” Sambrook et al., (1989); “CurrentProtocols in Molecular Biology” Volumes I-III Ausubel, R. M., ed.(1994); Ausubel et al., “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology”, JohnWiley and Sons, Baltimore, Md. (1989); Perbal, “A Practical Guide toMolecular Cloning”, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1988); Watson et al.,“Recombinant DNA”, Scientific American Books, New York; Birren et al.(eds) “Genome Analysis: A Laboratory Manual Series”, Vols. 1-4, ColdSpring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York (1998); methodologies as setforth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,666,828; 4,683,202; 4,801,531; 5,192,659 and5,272,057; “Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook”, Volumes I-III Cellis,J. E., ed. (1994); “Culture of Animal Cells—A Manual of Basic Technique”by Freshney, Wiley-Liss, N.Y. (1994), Third Edition; “Current Protocolsin Immunology” Volumes I-III Coligan J. E., ed. (1994); Stites et al.(eds), “Basic and Clinical Immunology” (8th Edition), Appleton & Lange,Norwalk, Conn. (1994); Mishell and Shiigi (eds), “Selected Methods inCellular Immunology”, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York (1980); availableimmunoassays are extensively described in the patent and scientificliterature, see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,791,932; 3,839,153;3,850,752; 3,850,578; 3,853,987; 3,867,517; 3,879,262; 3,901,654;3,935,074; 3,984,533; 3,996,345; 4,034,074; 4,098,876; 4,879,219;5,011,771 and 5,281,521; “Oligonucleotide Synthesis” Gait, M. J., ed.(1984); “Nucleic Acid Hybridization” Hames, B. D., and Higgins S. J.,eds. (1985); “Transcription and Translation” Hames, B. D., and HigginsS. J., eds. (1984); “Animal Cell Culture” Freshney, R. I., ed. (1986);“Immobilized Cells and Enzymes” IRL Press, (1986); “A Practical Guide toMolecular Cloning” Perbal, B., (1984) and “Methods in Enzymology” Vol.1-317, Academic Press; “PCR Protocols: A Guide To Methods AndApplications”, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. (1990); Marshak et al.,“Strategies for Protein Purification and Characterization—A LaboratoryCourse Manual” CSHL Press (1996); all of which are incorporated byreference as if fully set forth herein. Other general references areprovided throughout this document. The procedures therein are believedto be well known in the art and are provided for the convenience of thereader. All the information contained therein is incorporated herein byreference.

Example 1 Generation of Red Grape Cell Lines

Materials and Methods

Plant Material:

Plant material was extracted from calli derived from all parts of grapecross sections, grape skin cells and grape seed coats.

Calli from Grape Cross Sections:

Young grape bunches, 4 to 8 cm long, were harvested from field growngrape plants 20-50 days post anthesis and were thoroughly rinsed inrunning tap water. Green immature berries of the seedless grape Vitisvinifera cv. “AVNIR 825” (a cross between Agraman and Gamay red) weresterilized for 10 minutes in a solution containing 1.3% w/v sodiumhypochlorite and (0.1% v/v) Tween 20, as a wetting agent. Explants weredissected, using a scalpel, into 2 to 3 mm long traversal sections underhalf-strength MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962, Physiol Plant 15:473-497)liquid basal medium supplemented with filter-sterilized 1.7 mM ascorbicacid and 0.8 mM citric acid, 100 mg/l DTT (dithiothreitol) and 50 mg/lacetyl cysteine. The following antioxidants were added to the cuttingmedium: PVP (0.5 and 1 g/l), L-cysteine (150 mg/l), gallic acid (1.5mg/l), DTT (70 mg/l), biopterin (15 mg/l), ascorbic acid (150 mg/l) andcitric acid (150 mg/l) in order to inhibit cell necrogenesis and toenable the recovery of green, health berry disks.

Berry disks were placed in 100×15 mm culture plates containing 25 ml ofautoclaved Murashige and Skoog, MS medium, solidified with 0.25%Gelrite. The pH was adjusted to pH 5.9 prior to autoclaving at 102 kpafor 15 minutes. Thirty plates each containing 25 berry disks, weresealed with Parafilm and incubated in the dark at 26° C. for three days.Cultures were incubated at 25° C. under a 16-h photoperiod of 15-30μmolm⁻²s⁻¹ irradiance provided by cool-white fluorescent tubes. MS saltand vitamins medium was also supplemented with 250 mg/l caseinhydrolisate, 2% sucrose and 100 mg/l inositol. For callus induction itwas also supplemented with 0.2 mg/l Kinetin and 0.1 mg/l NAA(α-naphthalenacetic acid) media designated as RD1.

3-4 weeks following culture initiation, a mixture of green and redcallus was visible along the berry disks. The callus was composed offriable, elongated cells, some of which exhibited a dark pigmentation ofanthocyanins. Callus sector enriched in anthocyanins were selected andindividually subcultured for propagation. Green callus sectors werecultured separately.

Calli from Grape Skin Cells:

Young grape bunches, 4 to 8 cm long, were harvested 20-50 days postanthesis from field grown grape plants and were thoroughly rinsed inrunning tap water. Green immature berries of the seedless grape Vitisvinifera cv. “AVNIR 825” (a cross between Agraman and Gamay red) weresterilized for 10 minutes in a solution containing 1.3% w/v sodiumhypochlorite and (0.1% v/v) Tween 20, as a wetting agent. Berry skinswere isolated by producing a cut of 3-8 mm in the berry skin and peelingoff only the skins using a sterile forceps. Skin isolation was performedunder half-strength MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) liquid basal mediumsupplemented with filter-sterilized 1.7 mM ascorbic acid and 0.8 mMcitric acid, 100 mg/l DTT (dithiothreitol) and 50 mg/l acetyl cysteine.

Berry skins were placed in RD-1 culture media. Following about 10-14days, cell clumps started to develop on the cut surface of the skinpills. Cell, enriched in anthocyanins, were selected and furthersubcultured into fresh media for further propagation.

Calli from Grape Seed Coats:

Young grape bunches, 4 to 8 cm long, were harvested 20-50 days postanthesis from field grown grape plants and were thoroughly rinsed inrunning tap water. Green immature berries of the seedless grape Vitisvinifera cv. “AVNIR 825” were sterilized for 10 minutes in a solutioncontaining 1.3% w/v sodium hypochlorite and (0.1% v/v) Tween 20, as awetting agent. Berries were cut open to reveal the young greendeveloping seeds. Immature seed coats were dissected and placed onculture medium. Isolation was performed under half-strength MS(Murashige and Skoog, 1962) liquid basal medium supplemented withfilter-sterilized 1.7 mM ascorbic acid and 0.8 mM citric acid, 100 mg/lDTT (dithiothreitol) and 50 mg/l acetyl cysteine.

The seed coat sections were placed in RD-1 culture media. After about12-20 days, seed coats turned brown and a callus started to appear ontop of the seed coat explants. Cell, enriched in red-brown pigmentation,were selected and further subcultured into fresh media for furtherpropagation.

Establishment of Liquid Cultures:

Liquid cultures were established by addition of 10 g of callus into 50ml of the different media (RD1-RD6-see below). All cell lines that weresuccessfully established on solid media developed a homogenous cellsuspension in the same media combinations but lacking a gelling agent.The addition of 70 mg/l DTT or 150 mg/l of either ascorbic acid orcitric acid improved growth and inhibited cell necrogenesis of berryderived suspension culture. All explant types were successfully utilizedfor the establishment of liquid cultures. Cultures were routinelysubcultured every 7-10 days to fresh growing media.

Additional Vitis Species that were Introduced in Order to EstablishBerry Derived Callus Cell Lines:

The following Vitis species were cultured using the above mentionedprotocol:

Vitis silvestris, V. muscadinia, V. rotundifolia, V. riparia, V.shuttleworthii, V. lubrisca, V. daviddi, V. amurensis, V. romanelli, V.aestivalis, V. Cynthiana, V. cineria, V. palmate, V. munsoniana, V.cordifolia, Hybrid A23-7-71, V. acerifolia, V. treleasei, V.betulifolia.

Additional Media Utilized for the Establishment of Calli from theDifferent Vitis species:

CP (Chee and Pool 1987, Scientia Horticulturae 32:85-95) salt andvitamins medium, also supplemented with 250 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 2%sucrose, 0.25% activated charcoal and 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). Forcallus induction it was also supplemented with 0.2 mg/l Kinetin and 0.1mg/l NAA (α-naphthalenacetic acid), media designated as RD2.

WPM (Woody Plant Medium), (Lloyd and McCown 1981, Int Plant Prop SocProc 30:421-427) salt and vitamins medium was also supplemented with 250mg/l casein hydrolisate, 2% sucrose, 0.25% activated charcoal and 100mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). For callus induction it was also supplementedwith 0.2 mg/l Kinetin and 0.1 mg/l NAA (α-naphthalenacetic acid), mediadesignated as RD3.

B5 (Gamborg et al. 1968, In vitro 12:473-478) salt and vitamins mediumwas also supplemented with 250 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 2% sucrose,0.25% activated charcoal and 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). For callusinduction it was also supplemented with 1 mg/l 2,4-D(2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and 0.2 mg/l BA (6-benzyladenine),media designated as RD4.

B5 (Gamborg et al. supra) salt and vitamins medium was also supplementedwith 250 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 6% sucrose, 0.25% activated charcoaland 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). For callus induction it was alsosupplemented with 1 mg/l 2,4-D and 0.2 mg/l BA, media designated as RD5.

B5 (Gamborg et al. supra) salt and vitamins medium was also supplementedwith 1000 mg/l casein hydrolisate, 9% sucrose, 0.25% activated charcoaland 100 mg/l inositol (pH 5.9). For callus induction it was alsosupplemented with 2 mg/l 2,4-D, 0.5 mg/l NAA, 0.2 mg/l kinetin and 0.2mg/l BA, media designated as RD6.

Results

The efficiency of callus production of Vitis vinifera grape crosssections, grape skins and grape seeds is exemplified in Table 1hereinbelow.

TABLE 1 % of plated Number of plate producing Type of callus Explanttype cultured calli produced Berry disks 537 64 Light red to purple Skin498 51 Dark red to purple Seed coat 428 49 Red brownish

The efficiency of production of the different callus ‘types’ from someof the Vitis species utilized in this study is summarized in Table 2hereinbelow.

TABLE 2 Explant Average efficiency of Callus Optimal Vitis species typecallus production (%) type Media Muscadinia B SC, S 43 Dark red RD1(rutondifolia) shuttleworthii B SC, S 29 Red RD3 aestivalis B SC, S 36Dark red RD2 Hybrid A23-7-71 B SC, S 19 Red- RD6 brownish amurensis BSC, S 51 Red RD1 (B—Berry disk, SC—Seed coat, S—Skin)

Example 2 Generation and Characterization of Red Grape Cell Preparations

Materials and Methods

Preparation of AVNIR 825 Cultured Red Grape Cell (RGC) Powder:

The cultured RGC were filtered and thoroughly washed with ×2 distilledwater, and the wet cells were suspended in water (1:1, v:v) andlyophilized. Alternatively, the washed cells were kept frozen at either−20° C. or −80° C., until further use. The dried RGC powder was groundto a fine powder that was kept at room temperature. Alternatively, thewashed cells were ground under liquid nitrogen immediately followingwashing (or following thawing of the frozen stored cells), and thendried to yield the fine powder.

One gram of ground wet RGC, or 50 mg of lyophilized dried RGC powder,were mixed with 700 μl of M199 medium (Gibco, Cat. No. 22340020)supplemented with 25 μg/ml endothelial mitogen and 5 U heparin, andincubated for 15 minutes at RT with vortexing every 5 minutes. Themixture was centrifuged (20000×g, 15 min, 4° C.) and the supernatant,containing the RGC extract (RGCE) was stored at −20° C. until furtheruse.

Preparation of Wine Samples:

microfuge tubes containg 1 ml of Cabernet Suavignon (Barkan winery,Israel, classic 2003), Petite Sirah (Barkan winery, Israel, classic2003), Cabernet Suavignon (La Tour de Paris, E.A.R.L. du Domain de GrandVigne, France 2004) were centrifuged under vacuum in Hetovac V R-1SpeedVac centrifuge at 40° C. to remove alcohol until a slurry wasobtained. Cabernet Suavignon (Byniamina, Israel, 2002) was lyophilized.The tubes were kept at 4° C. or −20° C. until further use. Prior to thebioassay (see below), M199 medium was added so that it resumed itsoriginal volume.

Preparation of Grape Seed Extract Samples:

50 mg of dry powder of grape seed extract (GSE) (OPC, batch 40501-0,Whole Health Products, Boulder, Colo., USA) was removed from thecapsules and suspended in 300 μl of water, incubated for 15 minutes atroom temperature with vortexing every 5 minutes. The mixture wascentrifuged (20000×g, 15 min, 4° C.) and the supernatant, containing thesolubilized GSE was kept at −20° C. until further use.

Characterization of Grape Extracts:

Polyphenolic compounds were extracted from grounded lyophilized RGC bycold methanol:water:acetic acid (11:5:1). These extracts were subjectedto HPLC using an RP-18 column, with (FIG. 1A) or without (FIG. 1B) acidhydrolysis (2N HCl, 60 min., 100° C.), based on the procedure describedby Oren-Shamir et al. (Plant Sci., 140:99-106, 1999). Before injecting,the samples were filtrated (Nalgene, 0.45 μm, PVDF). The polyphenolprofile was determined using an HPLC (Shimatzu, Japan) equipped with anLC-10AT pump, a SCL-10A controller and a SPD-M10AVP photodiode-arraydetector. Extract samples were loaded on to the RP-18 column (Vydac201TP54) and separated by a gradient mixture of the following solutions:DDW (A) and H₂O:MeCN:HOAc (107:50:40:3) (B), both solutions at pH 2.3(titration with H₃PO₄ or NaOH). A linear gradient (flow rate of 0.5 mlmin⁻¹) was applied starting from ratios of 4:1 (A:B) to 3:7 over 45 min,and held at a 3:7 ratio for an additional 10 min. Polyphenol profileswere visualized mainly by their absorbance at 530 nm, 310 nm and 280 nm.

Results

RGC powder was stored at temperatures between −80° C. and RoomTemperature (RT) for periods over 18 months with no observable changes.RGC powder was found to be tasteless with no aftertaste as well.

Example 3 Effect of RGC Extract, Red Wine and GSE on ET-1 and eNOSLevels in Human Endothelial Cells

The anti-inflammatory power of red grape cell extract of the presentinvention, Red Wine and GSE was measured by quantitative analysis oftheir ability to increase the production of eNOS and to inhibit theproduction of ET-1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). AsET-1 is a secreted protein, levels were determined by analyzing theincubation media. eNOS is not a secreted protein and thus eNOS levelswere determined in the HUVEC at the end of the incubation period.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of Endothelial Plates:

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were supplied from theHematology Laboratory of Rambam Medical Center as proliferating cells.The flask containing the cells was incubated for one day in a humidifiedincubator at 37° C. in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂. These conditions weremaintained throughout the experiment. The cells were then harvested bytrypsinization and cryopreserved in identical aliquots. Prior toperforming the bioassay, one aliquot was thawed and cultured in a 100 mmdish, precoated with 50 μg/ml fibronectin, containing M199 mediumsupplemented with 20% FCS, 25 μg/ml endothelial mitogen, 50 μg/mlpenicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin and 5 U heparin. After the cellsreached 70%-90% confluency, they were harvested by trypsinization andwere evenly distributed into 24-wells pre-coated plates. The medium wasrefreshed every second day.

Incubation of Endothelial Cells with RGC Extract, Red Wine and GSE:

Upon reaching 70%-90% confluency of the cells in the 24-wells plate,samples (300 μl) containing freshly prepared serial dilutions (in amedium devoid of FCS) of either RGC, GSE or Red-wine, were added to thewells and incubated for 6 hours in duplicates. Following incubation, themedium, devoid of the attached cells, was completely collected for ET-1quantitative determination. The attached cells were washed with PBS andthen dissolved in Lammeli solubilization SDS buffer for Western blottinganalysis.

ET-1 determination:

The media taken separately from each well was centrifuged, and 50 μl wastaken from the supernatant and quantitatively determined for its ET-1level either by radio-immuno assay (using Endothelin-1 RIA kit No.5-2024.0001, Bachem AG, Switzerland, results shown in FIG. 1), or byELISA (Endothelin EIA Kit No. 583151, Cayman Chemical, Ann Harbor Mich.,USA, results shown in Table 1). Control of HUVEC incubated in the mediumalone were considered as 100% ET-1 production. Assays were performed induplicates. ET-1 levels in each well were calculated as % of thecontrol.

The threshold concentration of each of the examined RGC Extract, RedWine and GSE samples, at which ET-1 inhibition was initiated, comparedto the control HUVEC, was determined as the lowest inhibitoryconcentration. The values obtained for ET-1 were normalized relative tothe amount of the cells in each well, estimated by the quantitativeanalysis of the total endogenous tubulin amount in each well (see eNOSdetermination).

eNOS Determination:

eNOS production was determined by western blot analysis of thesolubilized endothelial cells using eNOS specific antibodies (anti NOS3,C20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA). Signal was detected by ECLusing peroxidase conjugated second antibody (Amersham) and thenvisualized on X-ray film or imaged with CCD camera (Alfa InnotechFluoroChem 8800). Determination of the amount of protein in the gelbands was performed by exposing the blot for a second time to anti-βtubulin (H-235 Santa Cruze Biotechnology, CA, USA) followed by thecolorimetric detection with alkaline phosphatase second antibody.Quantification of the eNOS bands by spot densitometry (Alfa Innotechsoftware) was normalized relative to the tubulin band intensity.

Cytotoxicity:

As elevated level of red-wine was found to be toxic to the HUVEC, thecells were examined for their cytotoxicity, to eliminate false results,by staining with tetrazolium salt MTT, used as cell viability andproliferating assay, (Corder 2002, Meth. Mol. Biol. 206:147-164).Following collection of the supernatant for ET-1 determination, thecells were washed with M199 medium devoid of phenol red, and incubatedfor 2 hours with 300 μl of 0.5 mg/ml MTT dissolved in the above medium.Following the incubation, the medium was removed and the insolubleformazan that was produced by the cells was solubilized with 300 μl DMSOand quantified in an ELISA Reader at 570 nm.

Results

Anti-Inflammatory Effect:

Since Cabernet Sauvignon was reported to be among the most potent winesconferring CHD protection (Corder et al, 2001, Nature 414:863-864), itwas the primary wine of choice to compare its cardiac-relatedanti-inflammatory power to that of RGC. Table 3 below summarizes theanti-inflammatory power of RGC preparations, commercial red wines andGSE, as determined by their threshold concentrations that alreadyinhibit the production of ET-1 in vein endothelial cells. The minimalamounts needed for each preparation to initiate inhibition of ET-1synthesis reflects their potential anti-inflammatory capacity and theirpotential positive effect in decelerating atherosclerosis.

TABLE 3 Material Amount in well Cabernet Sauvignon 4 μl Barkan, classic2003, IL Syrah 6 μl Barkan classic 2003, IL Cabernet Sauvignon 3.5 μl;La Tour de Paris 2004, FR GSE >5 × 10⁻³ mg Lyophilized RGC 1 × 10⁻³ mgFrozen RGC 7 × 10⁻³ mg (dry weight)

FIG. 1 illustrates the anti-inflammatory effect of RGC, grown onsolidified medium, compared to Cabernet Sauvignon (Binyamina 2002, IL).Extract from 16 mg of red grape cells reduced the level of ET-1 tentimes greater than 0.12 ml of red wine. Therefore, extract derived from1 g (fresh wet weight) of grape cells will reduce ET-1 level asefficiently as 75 ml of red wine. As can be seen in FIG. 2, red grapecell extracts activated expression of eNOS to a much greater extent thanCabernet Sauvignon and its polyphenol fractions and 1:2 dilution ofserum taken from feed-restricted (lane 8) and free-fed (lane 9) chickens(used as a positive control).

Polyphenol Content:

RGCP contains 3-15% polyphenols (depending mainly on growth conditionsand genetic source), compared to 2 g/litre in red wines and over 50% inthe commercial GSE tested as determined by the Folin-Ciocalteau micromethod (galic acid as standard). Thus, the polyphenol amount needed tocompletely inhibit ET-1 synthesis in the bioassay is much smaller thanthat needed in the other products.

Cytotoxicity:

Data obtained from the ET-1 and eNOS bioassays were considered relevantonly if cytotoxicity determination performed for each experiment showedthat the extract added to the well was not toxic to the HUVEC. Thosewells, in which death of HUVE cells was observed, were eliminated fromthe calculated data. Most of cytotoxicity effects were observed when redwine samples at high concentrations were used.

Example 4 Taste and Aroma Tasting of Grape Cell Extracts of the PresentInvention

Under laboratory conditions, 18 calli samples (approx. 2.5-5 g freshweight) of Vitis vinifera cv. AVNIR 825 were collected from growingvessels, washed carefully with running tap water from access growthmedia, and placed in a 18 multi well plate. The calli were dried byblotting and were further kept at temperatures between 2° C. and 26° C.for 1-5 h. Under these conditions tasting experiments took place by apanel of 10 referees. All 10 referees indicated that all the calli weretasteless and did not indicate any specific unpleasant taste and/oraroma.

In a second experiment performed in an identical fashion, 14 callisamples (approx. 2.5-5 g fresh weight) of Vitis species (see Table 2)were tasted by a panel of 10 referees. Nine out of 10 referees, tastingthe calli, indicated that the different calli were tasteless and did notindicate any specific unpleasant taste and/or aroma. One refereereported a slight pleasant berry flavor in the Vitis musdadinia calli.

It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, forclarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also beprovided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, variousfeatures of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in thecontext of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or inany suitable subcombination.

Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specificembodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modificationsand variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art.Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives,modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scopeof the appended claims. All publications, patents and patentapplications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated intheir entirety by reference into the specification, to the same extentas if each individual publication, patent or patent application wasspecifically and individually indicated to be incorporated herein byreference. In addition, citation or identification of any reference inthis application shall not be construed as an admission that suchreference is available as prior art to the present invention.

1. A composition comprising: a cell line callus culture of grape berrycells grown in vitro, whereby the cell line callus culture of grapeberry cells is derived from one or more of grape-berry cross section,grape-berry skin, grape-berry flesh, grape seed, grape embryo of seededor seedless cultivars or grape seed coat; wherein the composition is anutraceutical composition.
 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein saidcell line callus culture is dried.
 3. The composition of claim 1,wherein the composition further comprises a nutraceutical acceptablecarrier.
 4. The composition of claim 1, wherein said cell line callusculture comprises at least 0.5% polyphenols.
 5. The composition of claim4, wherein said cell line callus culture comprises at least 2%polyphenols.
 6. The composition of claim 1, wherein said cell linecallus culture is derived from a colored or a non-colored grape.
 7. Thecomposition of claim 1, wherein said composition is designed for amucosal delivery.
 8. The composition of claim 1, wherein saidcomposition is tasteless.
 9. The composition of claim 1, wherein saidcomposition is in a form of a mouthwash, a strip, a foam, a powder, achewing gum, an oral spray, a lozenge, a capsule, a and toothpaste. 10.The composition of claim 1, wherein said composition is in a form of apowder.
 11. An alcohol free composition comprising: a cell line callusculture of grape berry cells grown in vitro, whereby the cell linecallus culture of grape berry cells is derived from one or more ofgrape-berry cross section, grape-berry skin, grape-berry flesh, grapeseed, grape embryo of seeded or seedless cultivars or grape seed coat;wherein the composition is a nutraceutical or a pharmaceuticalcomposition and comprises less than 1% alcohol.
 12. A low sugarcomposition comprising: a cell line callus culture of grape berry cellsgrown in vitro, whereby the cell line callus culture of grape berrycells is derived from one or more of grape-berry cross section,grape-berry skin, grape-berry flesh, grape seed, grape embryo of seededor seedless cultivars or grape seed coat; wherein the composition is anutraceutical or a pharmaceutical composition and said cell line callusculture of grape berry cells comprises less than 10% sweetening sugar.13. A composition comprising: a cell line callus culture of grape berrycells grown in vitro, whereby the cell line callus culture of grapeberry cells is derived from one or more of grape-berry cross section,grape-berry skin, grape-berry flesh, grape seed, grape embryo of seededor seedless cultivars or grape seed coat; wherein the composition is apharmaceutical composition.
 14. The composition of claim 13, whereinsaid cell line callus culture is dried.
 15. The composition of claim 13,wherein said composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptablecarrier.
 16. The composition of claim 13, wherein said cell line callusculture comprises at least 0.5% polyphenols.
 17. The composition ofclaim 16, wherein said cell line callus culture comprises at least 2%polyphenols.
 18. The composition of claim 13, wherein said cell linecallus culture is derived from a colored or a non-colored grape.
 19. Thecomposition of claim 13, wherein said composition is designed for amucosal delivery.
 20. The composition of claim 13, wherein saidcomposition is tasteless.
 21. The composition of claim 13, wherein saidcomposition is in a form of a mouthwash, a strip, a foam, a chewing gum,an oral spray, a lozenge, a capsule, a toothpaste and a food.
 22. Thecomposition of claim 21, wherein said composition is in a form of apowder.